I agree with Larry's and Joe's agreeing with Steve
and Eve,
I've found CCIS's "inspections" to be very helpful
in identifying possible "trouble" areas that OSHA and/or other agencies could
find "disagreeable." I don't believe that asking OSHA to conduct an
inspection to try to address "trouble areas" is any guarantee that OSHA's
"informal inspection" wouldn't result in formal violations. It used to be
that you could invite them in and they'd give you a list of possible violations
without it becoming a formal enforcement. But since the
very unfortunate events occurred in Coos Bay a few years ago, I think that
"standard" has changed where everything's now game.
It is much better to have CCIS than OSHA perform
this service. In addition to looking for problems, they may actually
discover that some areas of your Ctiy's operations are either not covered or not
covered enough. We had to go through and reinstitute (or formally create)
procedures and records for a CIS inspection some years back that
took a lot of time and created a lot of stress, which eventually
led to a lot of after-hours "refreshments." But, it was well worth it
because we are as compliant with OSHA as we can possibly be (at least until the
next inspection ;-) ); where we weren't even close
before. Guess what I'm saying is that it is better to go through this
"headache" now, in conjunction with CCIS, than to go through it with
OSHA where you could face fines of $5,000 to $100,000 for not
having everything up to code...in addition to the fact that you'll still have to
do all the paperwork, etc.
I know - imagine me being positive over insurance -
guess I've been swayed to the dark side by the music of Noel and Dany's Boys
over the years. ;-) Seriously, it is well worth the effort with CIS and these
investigations...gotta remember, since Coos Bay (and a few other incidents),
OSHA has been under fire for not being "proactive" enough. That, ladies
and gentleman, is a very scarry (and depressing) thought!!!
Michael