Steve: Union did that to me, my first evaluation here. The 360-degree thing was limited, though, to City employees (as well as Council, of course). I didn't and don't like the idea, but it turned out okay. Staff were relatively supportive (which was nice), and also left me surreptitious copies of what they were giving the Council--and I did get some good pointers about my performance from those. Second time around, the union weighed in (at the request of the employees) and sent a letter saying they didn't think it was proper for employees to be evaluating their bosses, and therefore they were instructing union members (which was everybody except the police chief) not to fill out the evaluation forms. So since then, it's just been the Council. (And me, of course. I insist with my employees that they do a self-evaluation as part of the process, and it becomes part of the record, too. And I insisted I be treated the same way.) So I guess I'd say it's potentially a good tool for the first time around, but maybe doesn't need to be repeated. At least not every year... Union (FRNA) Joe At 09:48 AM 9/25/06, you wrote: >Dear fellow city managers: > >I am approaching my evaluation in October and the Mayor has decided to use >the 360 degree evaluation using surveymonkey.com. Apparently she enters all >the email addresses of the employees, council and planning commission and >they send out a questionnaire and they return it back to the Mayor with the >responses without giving names. I remember a discussion on the listserve a >while back about this topic but I wanted to respond to the Mayor in writing >as to why a 360 evaluation is a bad idea. Any input would be greatly >appreciated? > >Thanks. > >Steven M. Weaver >City Manager >City of Carlton >P.O. Box 458 >Carlton, OR 97111 > >Phone: (503) 852-7575 >Fax: (503) 852-7761 >sweaver@ci.carlton.or.us > > > > > >--- >You are currently subscribed to occma as: admin@cityofunion.com. >To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-occma-537U@list.orcities.org